The Mets That Were, by Leonard Shecter, Dial Press, 1970.
It is generally accepted that Shea Stadium was not one of the classic ballparks in the long history of the national pastime. Yet more than 56,000 were on hand for the final game on Sept. 28, 2008.
On the other hand, when the same Mets played the final game of the very historic Polo Grounds, less than 2,000 showed up to pay their respects. Granted there wasn’t all the hoop-de-do that modern events seem to balloon into, always looking for make an extra buck by playing on people’s nostalgia, but even so…
The dropped pop-up by Luis Castillo against the Yankees with two outs in the ninth inning could just as easily easily been seen during those first two seasons, as Shecter – who is too often forgotten for his contributions to Jim Bouton’s essential Ball Four — captures so humorously in this little gem, as he focuses on the team’s first two seasons. They may have played in the home of the Giants of John McGraw, but they sure didn’t play like the Giants.
Did the Mets really seem to invent ways to lose that were heretofore beyond consideration or was it all just media spin? Surely the Dodgers (with Casey Stengel as their leader) or the Browns or the pitiful Pirates of the 1950s were just as creative. Perhaps it was the absence of a National League rerpesentative that made New Yorkers more tolerant. Bad baseball is better than no baseball at all. Or perhaps not, as Schecter writes during the 1963 season:
The fact, though, that while Mets fans loved the Mets when they lost, it was a love like that a mother bestows on a son who has just missed a scholarship. Better things had been expected.
Shecter, a sportswriter for The New York Post who died in 1974 at the age of 48, wrote Once Upon in the afterglow of the Amazin’ year and concludes with the consequences that success engendered:
It is different now, obviously. Casey Stengel is gone. A pennant has been won, and a world championship. It is a glorious thing, and yet somehow sad. For what we feel for the Mets now will never be quite the same as what we felt during those first two years. We have tasted victory and we shall root not for survival, but for more victory. It was inevitable, we understand now, for this to happen; it’s only that it happened so soon, so swiftly. Still, the Mets are there (at slightly higher prices) and there is still much joy to take from them. We cannot be blamed, though, those of us who sit amidst the thundering crowd and quietly tell our young ones a tale that begins: “Once upon the Polo Grounds…”
Speaking og “higher prices,” I wonder what Shecter would say these days. By the way, the list price for the original hardcover edition? $3.95.
As big a Mets fan as I am, I had never heard of this title but I’m glad I found it. Shecter is an overlookd writer. It’s too bad he couldn’t have stuck around longer to enjoy the success of Ball Four and add further oevures to his portfolio.
* Well, they do have the time for it now
10 10 2009Kerel Cooper, who hosts OntheBlack, (“NY Mets Video Blog Providing News, Opinions and Analysis”), has a thought that applies to the entire organization:
Reading is FUNdamental.
In this video, he suggests the Mets’ would do well to devote part of their off-season (their long off-season) to boning up on the game via these titles:
You might think this is meant as a goof, but Cooper isn’t joking and he makes a lot of sense as he describes how these books might help the Mets get back to former greatness next year and beyond.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: baseball books, New York Mets
Categories : Commentary, Lists, Reference, Reviews from other sources, Team profile, Video