* Author profile: Dale Tafoya

19 06 2008

In today’s Modesto Bee.

Odd that anyone would want to be associated playing a role in the steroids era, but according to the piece,

What you may not recall, though, was Canseco and McGwire during their stay in Modesto. Canseco was here in 1984, McGwire the final month of ‘84 and all of ‘85. They overlapped for only the end of ‘84 while the Motown A’s nailed down a California League title.

McGwire and Canseco were young, ambitious and would have done anything to make
a name for themselves in baseball. Sadly, we found out later how far they went.

Like if they had played their ball in another city, they wouldn’t have gotten involved with PEDs? Modesto is a hotbed of the steroids community? And after all is said and done, the best Tafoya can come up with is, “Did Modesto have a role in the steroids era? Possibly.”

And possibly not.





* Author profile: Dale Tafoya

3 06 2008

The author of The Bash Brothers: A Legacy Subpoenaed, gets the treatmen courtesy the Contra Costa Times.

Note to local readers: Tafoya will be signing copies of his new book at Borders in Pleasant Hill on Saturday, June 8.





* RK Review: Vindicated

17 05 2008

Big Names, Big Liars, and the Battle to Save Baseball
by Jose Canseco

When his first book — JUICED: Wild Times, Rampant ’Roids, Smash Hits, and How Baseball Got Big — was published in 2005, Jose Canseco received the same enmity as Jim Bouton a generation before.

Bouton, a pitcher for the New York Yankees, Seattle Pilots and Houston Astros (with a brief comeback attempt for the Atlanta Braves) in the ’60s and ’70s, wrote BALL FOUR, which ushered in a new era of sports book. Out was the “heroes on a white horse” paean; in was the tell-all, behind-the-scenes exposé.

Canseco, a powerfully built slugger for the Oakland Athletics and several other teams, proudly came forward to admit that he had used steroids to help further his career. Not that he condoned such activity, mind you, even though he said repeatedly how much he loved what they did for him physically and psychologically and how he instructed others in their usage. In fact, Canseco spends a good deal of print contradicting himself. Of course, he should be excused because everything he did, he did to make good on a promise to his poor old mother to “be the best.”

He portrayed himself as the voice of truth and reason, and bemoaned the fact that no one would believe him and that his noble intentions got him blackballed from the game. It couldn’t possibly be that the fact his skills had eroded was the reason he could no longer find employment. But, as the saying goes, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not trying to get you.

Although JUICED was considered just a cut above The National Enquirer for integrity and reliability, it actually did open the consciousness about performance-enhancing drugs, and for that he deserves some credit, as much as readers, fellow players, sports journalists and baseball executives are loathe to admit it. Unfortunately, Canseco wasn’t content to leave it at that.

In VINDICATED: Big Names, Big Liars, and the Battle to Save Baseball, he feels compelled to give his critics a great big “I told you so,” taking the credit for blowing the whistle on an issue that the owners and Players Association ignored in order to bring in more fans, appreciative of the mammoth home runs hit by such musclemen as Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds. But even a stopped watch is right twice a day. Canseco wants thanks for following his conscience and taking on the Herculean (or is it Cassandran) task of single-handedly trying to “save baseball,” as he indicates in his subtitle.

The book was put together hastily following the December 2007 Mitchell Report that named scores of players suspected of “using,” names Canseco said he didn’t need to reveal in his first go-around, although he claimed that 80 percent of players were imbibing.

In some cases, Canseco (most likely at his lawyers’ urgings) does not actually come out and accuse players. Rather he lists their statistics “before and after,” implying that drugs were the reason. As further “evidence,” he includes a photo gallery of several players early in their careers and more recently. See the changes in their bodies? How else can you explain their new buff looks? How could they not be pharmaceutically enhanced?

One name he does mention, with particular venom, is New York Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez. Canseco devotes several pages to explaining why he didn’t name “A-Rod” in JUICED, despite stating that the perennial all-star was constantly pestering him with questions and asking to be put in touch with the proper people. The reason? Because Canseco hated him for trying to steal his wife. It seems to me that if he hated him that much, he would have pointed the finger as soon as he had the chance. This is just another example of the inconsistencies in VINDICATED.

Many critics have accused Canseco of not having anything new to say, that he was just trying to make some additional coin off the Mitchell Report and subsequent Congressional hearings in March. The construction of the book seems to concur. To flesh it out, he includes the lengthy statistical appendix as well as partial transcripts from his hearing testimony and lie detector tests, which, as anyone who has ever watched an episode of “Law & Order” will tell you, proves nothing conclusively. He finishes up with a chapter revealing a typical “day in the life” now that he is out of baseball.

Canseco had a difficult time bringing his latest project to press. First there was trouble finding a publisher, then his original ghostwriter dropped out. Pablo Fenjves, who took on the assignment at the last minute, is nowhere to be found on the cover, blurb, or title or copyright pages; he is mentioned in the acknowledgments, though without explanation of his participation — just another name in a list.

Canseco claims that everything he did was for the love of the game. Maybe he really believes that. It’s hard to tell because he comes across as so phony.

(This review appeared on Bookreporter.com on May 16. Click here for a review of his first book, Juiced.)





* Vindicated once more

5 05 2008

After a lull, Jose Canseco is back in the news after he defaulted on his mortgage and his home was foreclosed. Poor Jose, but look on the bright side. This can be fodder for his next book. a paranoic, conspiracy theory about how the baseball establishment ruined him for daring to speak “the truth.”

Anyway, here’s the NY Times on books not on Bud Selig’s night stand. The LAist Web site published this somewhat bizarre interview, the type where you expect to find a question like, “if you could be a tree, what tree would you be?”

There’s no denying Canseco is a sad figure, but here’s Arash Markazi’s piece from SI.com on how just how sad (and lonely). “Much like a washed up pitcher that has lost his stuff, there is nothing more Canseco, who was turned away from the Mitchell Report press conference in December, can add to the steroids conversation besides old tales and hear-say he’s regurgitated for the past three years.,” Markazi writes. “He all but admits as much when talking about his plans for a third book, Prototype, a fictional tale of a baseball cloning conspiracy set in the future. ‘It’s going to be a dark sci-fi story,”’says Canseco. “‘t’s certainly where we’re heading in baseball.’

Thanks, but I think I’ll wait for the movie to come out. Besides, didn’t they already cover this?

visitor stats





* Job posting: Canseco needs a new mouthpiece

11 04 2008

The New York Dailly News reports that Jose Canseco and his lawyer,, Robert Saunooke, have “parted ways.”

“What’s percolating is I don’t represent him anymore. I terminated my relationship with him,” said Saunooke. “Just moving on. It’s a number of things. Irreconcilable differences, disagreement on some issues. I just don’t need the hassle anymore.”

visitor stats





* Canseco update

10 04 2008

Okay, it’s been at least five minutes since we’ve heard anything about Jose Hemingway. For those of you who need a fix, here are a few crumbs:

  • The Week is an interesting publication, kind of like a condense Reader’s Digest offering snippets from other publications on the major events of the last seven days. As such, it has to be circumspect in what it chooses to include in its scant pages. This week, it takes up the Canseco kerfuffle with a synopsis of “what happened” and “what the commentators said” (from Newsday, Rotoworld.com, and The New York Times.
  • From the Santa Rosa (CA) Press Democrat, this review by Lowell Cohn who poses the question, “Who is a worse human being, the baseball player who uses performance-enhancing drugs or the baseball player who snitches on other ballplayers who use performance-enhancing drugs.”
  • From the University of Tulsa’s Collegian Online: “Most sequels fail to live up to their original and this futile attempt at literary greatness is no exception.” Out of the mouths of babes…
  • From the Scripps Howard News Service: Headline: “Canseco’s new book doesn’t pass smell test.”
  • From north of the border, Stephen brunt from the Toronto Globe and Mail writes that Canseco may be nuts, but that doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
  • From Bleacherreport, another profile.
  • When Canseco visited Chicago on his book tour, the Sun-Times and the Tribune both took note. Jay Mariotti of the S-T wrote that despite what the mssage way, the author was a commanding presence, while the Trib’s David Haugh is is almost complementary in his article, calling the book “sometimes edgy.” The same thing occurred when Canseco was in Boston, as The Globe covered his booksigning at a local Borders (this coverage by CBS includes video).

Photo by Boston Globe

visitor stats





* Reviews: Vini, Vici, Vindicated

2 04 2008

They’re coming in fast and furious now.

  • Selena Roberts on SI.com writes that Canseco’s allegations about other players who use warrant further scrutiny. “It’s up to baseball’s new detective squad to unearth the truth about A-Rod, about Ordonez, about their owners, before Canseco makes it a trilogy.”
  • Chris Olds of the Orlando Sentinel calls Vindicated “a very simple P.S. to Juiced, an I-told-you-so update with a $25.95 cover price.”
  • Sid Dorfman, a 70-plus year veteran of sports journalism for the Newark Star-Ledge. is surprisingly generous for an “old-school” guy. While he has no special love for the knuckleheaded Canseco, he does point out that he was more than a pretty fair player in his day. Great line, nodding to the statement that Canseco introduced Alex Rodriguez to a drug supplier: “I’ve met any number of hoods in my time and no one has yet suggested that I’m a member of the mob.”
  • As Canseco makes the talk show circuit, he should develop a tougher skin, as reported by sports media columnist Richard Sandomir in The New York Times.

visitor stats





* It’s funny because it’s true

1 04 2008

How come we’re not hearing much about Vindicated these days? Just a week ago it was such hot news. Now, nothing. I imagine I’ll be reviewing it at some point, but so far I haven’t seen it among any of the baseball book reviews published so far.

visitor stats





* Nightline’s report on Vindicated

28 03 2008

When did this once-estimable program turned into a supermarket tabloid?

In the words of several sports pundits, this whole thing makes me want to take a shower.

visitor stats





* This time I really mean it

27 03 2008

I felt it was my duty to report that Canseco will be the subject of a Nightline segment this evening. As a bonus, the page links to an excerpt from Vindicated.

Man, that show has gone downhill since Ted Koppel left.

visitor stats





* Vindicated vitriol

27 03 2008

Yeah, I know what I said, but here are a few fallout items of note on the Canseco project.

The most “impressive” of the bunch comes from the mind of Pat Jordan on Deadspin.com, who started the whole ballplayer-as-writer business with his 1960 books A Short Season and The Pennant Race. He comes to the conclusion that Canseco is not a very nice man. (Warning: the language and subject matter is X-rated at times.)

Other items include:

visitor stats





* Vindicated update

26 03 2008

I’m not going to spend a lot of time rehashing all the news that comes out about Vindicated. They’re pretty much rehashings of the same story, Rodriguez this, Ordonez that, blah, blah, blah. Here’s a piece from today’s New York Times; it will probably be the last from the Bookshelf until the actual reviews start coming in (or until someone takes a shot, literally, at Canseco. Whichever comes first.)

visitor stats





* The next Clemens Report

26 03 2008

“Weighing the Committee Record: A Balanced Review of the Evidence Regarding Performance Enhancing Drugs in Baseball”

Is that like FOX News is “clear and balanced?”

The official press release:

U.S. House of Representatives
Minority Report: No Easy Answers in Clemens Steroid Use Case
Details Don’t All Add Up For Pitcher or Trainer, Investigators Find

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 25, 2008 — Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., Ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, today released a staff report analyzing the body of evidence that prompted the Committee to refer the question whether Roger Clemens lied to Congress when he denied ever using steroids or human growth hormone.

New information has emerged, since the Committee’s high-profile hearing, about differences in testimony given by Clemens and McNamee on secondary issues such as whether Clemens attended a barbeque at Jose Conseco’s house or whether Clemens received vitamin B-12 injections. Further investigation also has revealed differences in the stories of Pettitte and McNamee about how Pettitte came to use human growth hormone to help him heal from an elbow injury.

According to the report, some of the information gathered by the Committee bolsters the case for referring the Clemens matter to the Department of Justice for further investigation. For example, McNamee’s angry reaction when Clemens’ teammate, Andy Pettitte, revealed Clemens had told him about using human growth hormone seemed critical. But other details could undermine the credibility of Brian McNamee, one of Clemens’ key accusers.

The report also lends credence to Clemens’ version of how he came to sustain a buttocks injury while with the Toronto Blue Jays in 1998. According to the report, team records show Clemens received a B-12 injection in July 1998, as Clemens stated. The team doctor confirmed giving the injection. And the injury – according to a physician’s exam and a subsequent MRI – turned out to be a bruise, not an abscess caused by a hurried steroid injection, as McNamee claimed. In fact, three of the four teams for which Clemens played acknowledged B-12 injections were administered during his time with those teams.

“Did Roger Clemens lie to us?”

Davis said. “Some of the evidence seems to say he did; other information suggests he told the truth. It’s a far more complicated picture than some may want to believe. Memories fade and recollections differ. That’s human nature, not criminal conduct. My concern is the integrity of sworn statements made to Congress. At this point, the Justice Department is best equipped to investigate that central question and reach a fair conclusion.”

The Committee minority is also planning to provide copies of additional investigative documents to the Justice Department relating to the probe into Clemens’ truthfulness. The documents, requested by DOJ to further its investigation, include staff notes of conversations with various individuals with knowledge of events about which the Committee received conflicting testimony.

# # #

You can read the entire report as a PDF file here

visitor stats





* Announcement: Vindicated on sale March 31

25 03 2008

According to this item in today’s on-line Publisher’s Weekly:

As Jose Canseco’s Vindicated arrives in stores, the controversial baseball player’s relationship with former Yankee pitcher Roger Clemens is under new scrutiny, as federal authorities investigate whether Clemens committed perjury when he denied using performance-enhancing drugs while testifying under oath to a Congressional committee. Canseco’s second book was picked up by Simon Spotlight Entertainment and ghostwritten by Pablo Fenjves (ghostwriter of O.J. Simpson’s If I Did It) after Berkley dropped the book due to skepticism about how much new information Canseco had to offer.

visitor stats





For Canseco, time to put his money where his mouth is

20 03 2008

According to this piece in the New York Daily News, Jose Canseco’s book tours in California “may take an abrupt detour: The former slugger and admitted steroid user is expected to have a face-to-face meeting with IRS special agent Jeff Novitzky, the government’s lead steroid investigator who is now focusing his efforts on whether pitcher Roger Clemens perjured himself before Congress.”

visitor stats