Time to play a little catch-up:
- From Pressboxonline.com, a Baltimore-sports oriented site, a review of Bert Randolph Sugar’s new coffee table book about the Hall of Fame. “[The author] left nothing out and I can’t think of a better way to educate those whom are grasping for a better understanding of baseball’s history than to give Sugar’s account a long look.”
- From the Magazine History blog, this entry about early articles on the new national game.
- From the Illinois-based Beacon News, a profile of first-time author John O’Donnell and his new book, Like Night and Day: A Look at Chicago Baseball 1964-1969.
- From NewJerseyNewsRoom, this Q & A with Curt Smith, author of the new Vin Scully biography. Smith will be at the Yogi Berra Museum in Little Falls on Sunday, June 28, at 4 p.m.
- Via a roundabout path, here’s a great piece by Robert Lipsyte on the spate of new books on baseball and steroids, including the usual titles (American Icon, The Rocket That Fell to Earther, A-Rod, Cooperstown Confidential, The Yankee Years, and more).
- Mark Lamster reviews Michael Shapiro’s Bottom of the Ninth in the Los Angeles Times. “Shapiro… does an admirable job telling this complex story. His biographical sketches of Rickey and Webb are especially compelling. But a sausage story is not always the most compelling of reads, and to inoculate himself against that reality, Shapiro has larded up this one by interspersing a second narrative, the story of Stengel’s final years with the Yankees, which is of little relation to the primary action of the book. It’s less than ideal, but Rickey, always an optimist, might have put a positive spin on it: Two stories for the price of one.”


Reading A-Rod, I got the feeling that she was channeling Robert Duval as the sinister sportswriter Max Mercy in The Natural who offers a veiled threat to Robert Redford’s Roy Hobbs. He can make or break the likes of Hobbs, he warns, demanding the ballplayer’s excluisve story. Where does such hostility come from? (To use another movie metaphor, Roberts reminds one of the erstwhile reporter in the classic films of the 1930s, willing to do anything to get the story. But those were usually comedies.)
The news falls into three basic camps: those who rejoice in anything that causes A-Rod pain or embarrassment, those who have a problem with author Selena Roberts, and the rest who believe enough is enough.










* Too much, too late?
25 07 2009For one thing, the timing. These books were released so long ago, relatively speaking (Years in February, the other two in May). Now in my day job at a weekly publication, I’m pretty liberal in the book review policy as farm as timing goes. But because we’re a speciality publication and the books we consider are pretty narrow in scope, we do what we want. We are not The New York Times, which should be concentrating on the cutting edge in all things newsworthy.
So why these books and why now? Each of them had been reviewed when they were originally released? With all the complaints about shrinking book sections, why did the editors decide it was worth re-examination, considering they were pretty much panned the first time around by the general reviewing public.
Sorry, I don’t get it. Nicholas Dawidoff, author of a couple of highly-regarded baseball-themed books, reviewed A-Rod, while the other two were handled by NYT staffer Michiko Kakutani.
You folks know me. I read anything about baseball, even bios on the Wheaties boxes, but given the publishing situation these days, I wish more thought would be given about needless duplication.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Alex Rodriguez, Joe Torre, New York Yankees, PED, Roger Clemens, sterodis
Categories : 2009 title, Commentary by Ron Kaplan, Reviews from other sources